The recent clash between the Tamil Nadu government and the central government over the three-language policy under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 is not just an administrative dispute but a deeply rooted political and cultural battle. Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin has strongly opposed the Centre’s push for the three-language formula, viewing it as an imposition of Hindi and a violation of the state’s linguistic autonomy. Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, on the other hand, has insisted that Tamil Nadu must adhere to the policy, as it aligns with the Indian Constitution. This controversy has revived a debate that Tamil Nadu has been engaged in for nearly a century, highlighting the state’s strong stance against Hindi imposition and its commitment to its two-language formula.
Tamil Nadu’s Opposition To Hindi Dates Way Back
Tamil Nadu’s resistance to Hindi dates back to the pre-Independence era, with the first anti-Hindi agitation occurring in 1937. When the Congress government, led by C. Rajagopalachari, attempted to make Hindi compulsory in schools, widespread protests erupted, lasting for three years. The movement re-emerged after Independence when the Centre decided to replace English with Hindi as the sole official language, leading to the 1965 anti-Hindi protests. These movements were not just linguistic protests but deeply tied to Tamil identity and regional pride. The Dravidian movement, which played a crucial role in shaping Tamil Nadu’s politics, has consistently championed linguistic autonomy and resisted perceived attempts at Hindi imposition.
Understanding The Three-Language Policy Under NEP 2020
The NEP 2020 introduces a flexible three-language formula that allows states to choose their preferred languages. According to the policy, schools will teach three languages: the mother tongue or regional language, Hindi or another Indian language, and English or any other foreign language. The Centre maintains that the policy does not impose Hindi but instead provides linguistic flexibility. However, Tamil Nadu has historically adhered to a two-language formula, with Tamil and English as the primary languages of instruction. The state government views the three-language formula as a step towards Hindi imposition, undermining its established language policy.
Tamil Nadu’s Stand Against Three-Language Policy
Chief Minister M.K. Stalin has firmly opposed the NEP, asserting that it threatens Tamil Nadu’s linguistic identity and educational autonomy. Stalin has gone so far as to state that he would reject the policy even if the Centre offered substantial financial incentives. His concerns stem from the belief that the three-language formula will gradually make Hindi a dominant language in the state, thereby marginalising Tamil.
Furthermore, Stalin has accused the Centre of using financial blackmail, as the Union government has allegedly withheld education-related funds due to Tamil Nadu’s refusal to implement the NEP.
Political Implications Of The Language Debate
The Opposition to the three-language policy is not just about education; it is a deeply political issue. The Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and its rival, the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK), have historically positioned themselves as defenders of Tamil identity. While the AIADMK has also rejected the three-language policy, the DMK has taken a more aggressive stance, framing it as an attack on federalism and linguistic autonomy. The BJP, which has been trying to establish a foothold in Tamil Nadu, faces significant resistance due to its association with Hindi promotion. The language debate allows regional parties like the DMK to consolidate their voter base by portraying themselves as protectors of Tamil Nadu’s unique cultural and linguistic heritage.
The Centre’s Justification And Potential Benefits of Hindi
The Union government argues that the three-language policy is essential for national integration and economic mobility. Hindi is the most widely spoken language in India, and knowledge of Hindi can open up more job opportunities, particularly in central government services and the corporate sector. IAS and IPS officers, who may be posted anywhere in the country, would benefit from knowing Hindi. Additionally, multinational companies operating in India often use Hindi for broader communication, which could be advantageous for Tamil Nadu’s workforce.
The Federal Structure And Autonomy In Education
Education falls under the concurrent list of the Indian Constitution, meaning both the Centre and states have the power to legislate on the matter. However, the NEP 2020 gives more authority to the Centre in several areas, leading Tamil Nadu to fear excessive central interference in its education system. Tamil Nadu argues that language policies should be decided by states based on their unique sociopolitical contexts rather than being dictated by the Centre. The ongoing dispute reflects the broader issue of federalism in India, where regional states seek greater autonomy in policymaking.
ALSO READ | Just A Courtesy Call? Why Hush-Hush Prashant Kishor-Vijay Meet Has TN Abuzz
Finding A Middle Ground
While Tamil Nadu’s concerns about linguistic identity and autonomy are valid, there is also merit in exposing students to multiple languages. A possible solution could be granting states complete flexibility in deciding the three languages, ensuring that Hindi is not imposed but remains an optional choice. The Centre could also provide incentives for states to include non-Hindi Indian languages instead of mandating Hindi. This would encourage linguistic diversity while respecting regional preferences.
Additionally, dialogue between the Centre and Tamil Nadu is essential to prevent further escalation. The language debate should not be used as a political tool but rather approached as an educational reform that benefits students. Tamil Nadu could also consider allowing students the choice to learn Hindi voluntarily without making it a mandatory subject.
The ongoing controversy underscores the challenges of balancing national integration with regional identity in a linguistically diverse country like India.
To resolve this issue, both the Centre and Tamil Nadu must engage in meaningful discussions rather than using language as a political weapon. A flexible and inclusive approach that respects regional sentiments while promoting multilingualism could serve as a viable solution. The larger goal should be to ensure that students gain the benefits of language-learning without feeling coerced into adopting a language that they perceive as a cultural imposition. By fostering an environment of linguistic diversity and mutual respect, India can truly embrace its multilingual heritage while preserving regional identities.
The writer is a technocrat, political analyst, and author.
[Disclaimer: The opinions, beliefs, and views expressed by the various authors and forum participants on this website are personal and do not reflect the opinions, beliefs, and views of ABP Network Pvt. Ltd.]
